Comments 544

Re: Burnout Developer Criterion Believes A New Entry 'Would Be Absolutely Phenomenal Now'

XxEvilAshxX

Too bad EA is too stubborn to admit that a new Burnout would absolutely bury their beloved NFS. They have a weird dedication to that series even though it's been more miss than hit for a long time.

On top of that they just killed off Dirt and Project CARS. Its like they want to force NFS to be popular by making it the only game in town (coughmadden).

Fortunately for us, Turn 10 and Playground can keep that from happening. And Polyphony, well they... exist.. also.

Re: These Eight Games Are Coming To Xbox Game Pass (November 17-30)

XxEvilAshxX

I've almost bought Insurgency a few times on sale, but since it's a MP game it's always been a bit of a crapshoot I'm not willing to risk, especially since I'd be playing it without any friends. Now I at least get to not only try it out, but play it with a buddy since there's no entry fee for either of us. Looking forward to it.

Re: EA Kills Project CARS As Part Of 'An Update To Our Racing Portfolio'

XxEvilAshxX

I mean, didn't we all know this was coming the moment EA bought Codemasters? I personally poured one out for the studio the second I heard the news.

It's a damn good thing that Microsoft has the Forza franchise and that Sony has.... Gran Turismo..... because if not EA would essentially own a racing monopoly on consoles.

Need For Speed, Dirt, F1, GRID, Burnout, Project CARS.. all under one roof, and we know EA isn't about comeptition, they buy up competing franchises just to kill them off. We all know we'll never see another Burnout, and we just saw whatever the **** they turned NFS into.

I don't think they'll outright "kill" Grid, but I'm not holding my breath on seeing anything else from that series any time soon.

Re: Sony Could 'Respond' To ActiBlizz Deal By Improving PS Plus, Suggests Microsoft

XxEvilAshxX

@Titntin MS isn't making these public statements for the CMA, they're making them for all the other governing bodies that are following this closely, like the FTC. They're making the points the CMA should be making so that when this is done and they move on to the next phase, those points are already inserted into the minds of the other committees they have to go through. The last thing MS wants is to deliberate with the CMA in private, so that the CMA can decide whatever they want. IF the CMA tries to block this, they're going to look like biased and "corrupt" (i say corrupt in the sense that they're not being objective like they're supposed to) to all the other governing bodies in the world. Essentially, MS is trying to make the CMA look bad by doing their job for them. This is obviously just speculation by me, but it's the way I'm seeing it.

Re: Microsoft Layoffs Are Reportedly Affecting Team Xbox

XxEvilAshxX

The key word here is "redundancies." They're not downsizing due to closing departments or dissolving positions. But when you have 100 people doing work that can effectively be done by 75, that's bad news for 25 of them. It's unfortunate but it happens. Also, "less than 1000" in a company as gigantic as MS is very little.

Re: Deathloop Xbox Series X And S Performance Modes Revealed

XxEvilAshxX

Isn't this supposed to be implementing DLSS or whatever Nvidia's version is? Perhaps they're still working on that and will come via a performance patch later.

This is one of those cases where I can see them wanting to get the port ready the nanosecond the contract expires and worry about the bells and whistles later.

Re: Xbox Dev Comments On Feedback For The New Dashboard

XxEvilAshxX

It would be great if they weren't there at all, but since GP is MS's bread and butter right now, I doubt those ads are going away.

What if, in the event a profile IS a GP Ultimate subscriber, one of the benefits is a minimized dashboard? What if one of the GP features was a dash that has NO ads for GP and maybe only one or two for the Xbox store? It would be nice if we were able to cut all that garbage out if we're already subbing to their service.