Comments 1,486

Re: Talking Point: One Year Later, How Do You Feel About Xbox RPG Avowed?

jesse_dylan

@Deadsea93 You still care enough to reply, 6 months later? Bruh. The game was also not objectively trash. I'm sorry you didn't like it, and that it didn't meet your expectations, or some weird hype that you listened to. That does not make it a bad game. Why not wait and see how a game is when it comes out instead of learning about a game in active development years before it comes out? Games constantly change in development.

Re: The First Review Is In For The Adventures Of Elliot: The Millennium Tales

jesse_dylan

@somnambulance It's not a you thing. It's just that these are fairly cheap to produce (comparatively), are making decent money for them, and are really the only place where retro-styled turn-based role-playing lives. So while they might look similar, and I get that impression is there (it's not a you thing), they're all pretty different in concept.

(There was also that World of Final Fantasy game, which I think was turn-based, but everyone has forgotten about it, and I never played that one!)

Re: Xbox Racks Up 2M Views With Comment That Appears To Address Mixtape's Review Backlash

jesse_dylan

@LeonR Sorry, I lost your comment somewhere. You had mentioned that there will be some hits and that the charts dictate it. That's kind of missing the point. Not every game needs to be a huge hit. Especially with games that have lower budgets, it's not necessary to ride the charts or sell millions of copies. That's not the barometer we should be using. And just because something doesn't top the charts doesn't mean it's trash. I'd rather have 100 indie games, of varying interest and quality, than one AAA checklist game that blows a huge budget on graphics and is exactly like everything else.

Re: Xbox Racks Up 2M Views With Comment That Appears To Address Mixtape's Review Backlash

jesse_dylan

@CaptainCluck There is a wide gulf between "philanthropic organization" and "takes money for reviews". And there is a huge difference between actual journalism, and people on youtube who get sponsorships and payment for reviews. You might not agree with IGN's reviews, or with their money or corporate practices, but they are legitimate journalism and hire legitimate journalists to do their reviews. They make their money from clicks and views, not from the company giving them money, unlike many youtubers.