Comments 259

Re: UK CMA Issues Official Response To EU's Activision Blizzard Verdict

Stamnoso

@S1ayeR74 I know that, the comment wasn't meant to be taken literally, my fault as it's possibly quite out of context and vague. My point is that I find this message just projects an image of self-doubt and I find the overall tone childish and is ultimately unnecessary. They'll, of course, have their reasons, but it doesn't change my opinion on it.

Re: UK CMA Issues Official Response To EU's Activision Blizzard Verdict

Stamnoso

Don't know who is right or not here, but I'm wondering why these guys felt the urge to go out there and, essentially, say " yeah, don't care what these guys say, I was right, just so you know world"

I just find it quite pathetic how the UK always seems to take any chance to throw something at the EU to try and make it like we're best. You'd think after Brexit we'd focus a bit more on ourselves, but it turns out we still do it anyway. Guess we have to keep feeding our delusions of being the "British Empire" rather than try to get a grip on ruling our own country properly. Just generally, not just making this about this CMA malarkey

Re: Talking Point: Are You Hoping Xbox's 'Gears Collection' Is Real?

Stamnoso

I wouldn't mind if it were true. Moved to Xbox as main about 6 months ago and been playing some of the old ones. Played gears 1 recently, so I'm actually giving a bit of time before going for 2, to see if this is true.

First one was good fun, liked the atmosphere, repeated some missions coop, was surprised to see some people playing still.

Re: 'No Xbox' Begins Trending On Twitter As Another Game Skips The Platform At Launch

Stamnoso

Not surprised about the netflix stuff cause they own this IP and studio so that's that. A bit funnier is the Xbox being missing point. Could be some stuff about cloud provider competition like you guys say, netflix seems to have some interest in games. Oxenfree was an interesting title, shame I won't play 2 on Xbox, but hardly a huge miss. I did enjoy the first one, but that's it.

I guess this gives MS more justification for their acquisition strategy if more and more studios keep leaving the platform out but releasing on almost everything else. We'll see over time I guess. Would really like MS to iron out whatever is happening with SE for example, if at all possible

Re: Xbox Fans Call On Bethesda To Delay Redfall Until 60FPS Is Ready

Stamnoso

This is personal opinion, but for me this is fine. I don't personally understand the obsession with FPS rates or resolution, but I guess I started this long journey in gaming with an Atari 2600 and ain't so bothered about this sort of stuff. If the game's fun, it's going to be regardless of 30 fps

Re: Xbox Misses Out On Yet Another Upcoming Square Enix Release

Stamnoso

I got a PS4 and switch, so personally this sort of stuff doesn't affect me too much. That said, to me it doesn't make a lot of sense to think that there isn't something else other than just finances happening here.

I'm throwing this as a bit of an open question in case anybody has a real sense of it. To me the SE question of releasing in Xbox is not if the game will have comparable sales to the other platforms. To me is more like will the cost of adapting to Xbox break even and get some profit from:

-sales over the world and, in particular, the almost half a million Xbox series consoles in JPN (even if a decent amount of these are secondary systems

-a gamepass deal. It feels Microsoft would be quite open to a reasonably decent deal to put on GP many of these games even if just as part of trying to attarct more customers in Japan or worldwide with Japanese game fans. Xbox is selling in Japan more consoles than it has in years, so not crazy to think they still might get a decent user base if they got more and more Japanese games there

Now the caveat here is that cost of adaptation, I'm assuming this is relatively low for games that are already there in possibly Switch and/or PS and PC. Here is where if anybody knows I'd love to hear, cause perhaps I'm assuming this to be lower that it actually is. Anyway, this would be my way of approaching te Xbox question as SE. I understand prioritising the other platforms, but I find difficult to think they wouldn't make some extra money based on the above premise.

Re: Three Rivals Feel Microsoft's ActiBlizz Deal Would Have 'Negative Impact On Competition'

Stamnoso

I don't really care that much if the deal goes ahead or not. It'd be interesting to know how they interviewed "rivals". I mean...if you pretty much throw open question to these, with no need for any sort of business case that supports your stance then no surprise they actually say "this is bad for industry". If they are actually rivals, then clearly they are biased. Agree with other people's position that you'd think these government organisations would be equipped to come up with their own fully independent view. I'm guessing when you know the full story these interviews and surveys make sense, but without knowing more it sounds really dodgy.

Re: Talking Point: Do You Buy Less Third-Party Titles Because Of Xbox Game Pass?

Stamnoso

I think this is more or less a given and it is fine, companies can decide whether they publish or not on gamepass based on the offer they got on the table.

It's good that GP gives them a chance to de-risk in the sense they will ensure making X money (based on whatever they've agreed with MS), but they might loose money in the long run if the game was to perform well in sales. This is just a business decision around risk and it's really mainly applicable on day one release I feel.

The other side, once a game has been on the market for a while, you'd expect that the bulk of the sales have been fulfilled by then and GP is a good way of ensuring additional income. For me, there are games that I wouldn't have played if it wasn't because of GP and of the back of that I bought dlcs. Recent examples for me are Scarlet Nexus and Vampire Survivors, wasn't gonna buy them but played them in GP, likes them and bought some dlc stuff, so that is extra income for them. Plus, there's the indirect benefit of now these are on my radar, so I would consider getting Scarlet Nexus 2, not perhaps on day one, but discounted.

Overall I feel GP gives just another option for companies to de-risk or get extra money and publicity to their games. Up to them to decide what makes sense or not. Markets are transitioning to different business models and companies need to account for that, unfortunately or not things like GP now exist and need to be taken into account on sales plan regardless of whether you're considering launching or not in GP.

Re: Report: EU Commission Preparing 'Statement Of Objections' Over Xbox Activision Blizzard Deal

Stamnoso

Well, probably will end up coming through with concessions. If not then it's time to repurpose that money, surely they have a plan B. I think Xbox should strengthen their Japanese arm, definitely an area where it's a lot weaker than others. Also, perhaps it shouldn't be about buying other studios and IP so much, perhaps paying for key IPs and launches is better and investing in hiring good people and developing new IP etc.

Re: Phil Spencer: Sony Wants To 'Make Xbox Smaller' To Protect PlayStation's Dominance

Stamnoso

It's no surprise Sony is doing this, is a bit dirty perhaps and bla bla bla, but that's the corporate world. I do actually think Microsoft are a lot more open with how you can play games on their ecosystem than any other equivalent company out there. I think as a consumer you can play Xbox games in many different ways, even been playing some Octopath Traveler on my phone occasionally with xcloud and runs surprisingly good.

As far as consumers access to games go, I do truly think that if you wanted to play an Xbox "exclusive" you definitely could, many options put there (e.g series S dirt cheap in black Friday etc.) Monopoly wise, well... perhaps an argument to be had here but still MS doesn't force you to buy a Xbox to play it as said, yeah they'll see some part of the profit in various ways but I truly don't think is such a big deal. Could very well be wrong, but ultimately I don't care if the the deal doesn't come through we'll still be able to play AB games anyway; this is something worth remembering...

Re: Pick One: Which Is Your Favourite CD Projekt Red Game On Xbox?

Stamnoso

I don't know, Witcher 2 I enjoyed a lot more than Witcher 3. Don't get me wrong, I feel the game wasn't that incredibly good for me. I still feel the combat was boring even in max difficulty. It's a good game no doubts and I enjoyed, but a step back for me. Kinda want to like cyberpunk but not sure when to jump in with it.

Re: Final Fantasy 16 Six-Month PS5 Exclusivity Window Confirmed By Sony

Stamnoso

To be honest SE is pretty weird when it comes to releasing stuff in my opinion. I still do believe FFVII remake will eventually come to xbox, mainly cause they are releasing CC-Reunion on it, it would feel weird to have the prequel chapter and that is it. How long will it take, is a different matter, I wouldn't be surprised if it was in, e.g. 10 years time on a FFVIII remake bundle with all games type of thing.

You never know with SE tough, I still find it funny that Xbox got Octopath Traveler (but not PS, it was on Stadia! FFS), and now Octopath traveler II is planned for Switch, PC and PS but not Xbox. I certainly find their logic quite interesting. I guess, bottom line is, with them you never know...we are talking about the people who fragmented KH in a 1000 different platforms, so who knows.

Re: Here's What The Critics Are Saying About Star Ocean: The Divine Force

Stamnoso

There's a bunch of decent Star Ocean games, but I haven quite enjoyed it that much since "til te end of time". I've got mixed feelings, kinda happy the franchise is back, but at the same time it doesn't feel like they've put the effort that, for me, SO deserved. I guess it's a secondary series. Might give it a try but not so sure based on the reviews. Will be interesting to see what you guys think and share here at some point.

Re: Xbox Boss Phil Spencer Hints At Plans To 'Raise Prices' In The Future

Stamnoso

Hardly surprising, this is going to happen and to a point we need to start accepting it. The key for me it's what it'll mean for the quality of services. If this is partly enabling a steady flow of good games both FP and TP, then I think it's all right-ish. Let's hope they don't get carried away, it'd be good if Sony started to make MS worry a bit more on for example the subscription front, never a good thing when corps start to have a too dominant position. We'll see what happens I guess.