Comments 1,995

Re: Xbox Game Pass Lost 'Millions' Of Subscribers Following October 2025 Price Increase

PsBoxSwitchOwner

It’s a little bit worrying that the ENTIRE gaming community (apart from those that would defend anything MS did) knew this would happen - yet execs paid millions still didn’t click on and that MS still went ahead with it. Was absolute madness. They had no choice but to reduce it to a more reasonable figure.

They still won’t fully recover those subs with no CoD included.

One thing it also shows is that be it Sony/Ms or whoever gamers are choosing their limits on this hobby as we have now had pushback against £80 games and high subscription prices and high console prices as both are now not selling in big numbers.

Re: Matt Booty Explains Xbox's Plans For Exclusive Games Going Forward

PsBoxSwitchOwner

Hey look more PR talk. Because why would you then give PS5 Spyro and Senua and SoD3(maybe you can argue as multiplayer here). And halo has multiplayer?

Fable is single player and still announced and I guess this signifies that FH6 will be going over as it’s multiplayer too.

I genuinely don’t think that MS don’t fully know what they want to do currently. Maybe helix can be called Xbox180?

Im in a lucky personal position where I own multiple systems but not everyone is

Re: Digital Foundry Labels Sony's PS5 Exclusivity Pivot As A 'Defensive Move Against Project Helix'

PsBoxSwitchOwner

@Sol4ris yes it was a little tongue in cheek. But it is often something that is said (like you say as it is in PS then they buy them
Anyway!)

But you can see the irony here that people are having a little dig at Sony for doing it when the recent poll has shown that Xbox gamers want MS to do.

Personally I’m in a lucky position where I have access to all - even a steamdeck now too - so exclusivity doesn’t massively impact me.

Re: Digital Foundry Labels Sony's PS5 Exclusivity Pivot As A 'Defensive Move Against Project Helix'

PsBoxSwitchOwner

Is it the right move for them? Possibly, the ports just haven’t sold on PC. So what are they losing? Very little. They either had to try day 1 release or stop them.

They are still releasing live service ***** on there too no? And luckily as everyone constantly states on here they don’t like the Sony single player games anyway.

It’s funny that many find this stance bad. When the number 1 change Xbox players want is exclusives back.

But Sony have an advantage that their exclusives are targeting 90million players whereas Xbox targets 40million or so. Hence why one wants full exclusives and why one will release on PC and elsewhere.

Re: Talking Point: Amidst PS6 Uncertainty, Do You Think Xbox Has Project Helix All Figured Out?

PsBoxSwitchOwner

I think they will have the same price issue. It’s just the world at the moment, MS aren’t immune to the cost of RAM etc etc. if you think otherwise then you aren’t being truthful.

Pushing it out too early and at an expensive price isn’t going to help - especially as they’ve previously announced it’s going to be ‘premium’. It’s extremely tricky situation to be in.

Re: 'The Results Ain't Pretty' - Oblivion Remastered Analysis Claims It's 'Still Broken' After One Year

PsBoxSwitchOwner

Original was full of bugs. Remaster was released in an absolute state. It only got good reviews because it was a ‘shadow drop’.

But it’s Bethesda. Issues with Starfield at launch that still persist on the ps5 launch 2-3years later.

I’ve always said in the past the issues that stopped MS getting top quality scores on 1st party games was the QA and polishing (remember Phil saying they had redfall scoring double digits higher in all metrics) but recently they have got these high scores like Indiana jones because the games release well.

It’s time now for MS to get Bethesda under some sort of quality control as it’s been in their stable long enough now