Comments 308

Re: 'Keep The Feedback Coming' - Xbox Boss Says New Console Features Were Built Two Weeks Ago

eduscxbox

@Fiendish-Beaver Features they implemented are not that complex technically speaking, it could be easily implemented in 2 weeks.

Quick Resume exists since launch = they just exposed a checkbox per title to disable it (developer could disable it since the beginning so they just exposed to the player though the checkbox)

Colors already existed, they just added an option so you can custom a color, it uses the same existing system underneath.

Group is the same thing, they already exist at the dashboard, they just built upon it.

So I believe it could be implemented within 2 weeks kinda easily.

As for Sharma knowing all that in a short time there are 3 things:

1 - I'm sure when they announced her for us, it had been previously offered to her the position, so she studied Xbox previously

2 - Xbox has a feedback system where people can vote for features, so they can easily know which ones to do by ordering by most votes and grabbing the easiests to-do in a short time frame.

3 - Phil is not completely retired yet. He is helping her with the transition and most likely showed her the ropes.

Re: 'Keep The Feedback Coming' - Xbox Boss Says New Console Features Were Built Two Weeks Ago

eduscxbox

@space_g0blin I think they meant not shoving into game development.

The copilot coming to Xbox is a feature that can easily be ignored and won't affect anyone who doesn't want it. It is basically a feature that you can ask anything like to recommend a game for you or help with a walkthrough to a game, or anything like that. But it is optional, it is in the menu and people who don't want it can leave it there and never use.

Copilot is already on PC on the Xbox App/Xbox Game Bar

Re: Highguard Players Are Getting Refunded As Developer Seemingly Closes Its Doors

eduscxbox

It is sad to see studios closing down.

Unfortunately, acting with disregard for players tend to make games fail.

The industry is trying so hard to push live-service games and its crazy how many go down and still comes up the next studio and say "Hey, look our new live-service game that does exactly the same thing the other 300 that failed before us did"

It is crazy.

Re: Starfield Gets Major Free Update & New Expansion Next Month, Alongside PS5 Release

eduscxbox

@themightyant

"I didn't say they lied, but they did deliberately mislead. E.g. they said things like 1000 planets and you could land almost anywhere on them and made that look exciting. That is an expectation THEY set."

Yes, they said that, and yes you can do that in the game, you can land everywhere.

And they addressed the empty planets at the 45 minutes Starfield Direct video Todd howard said: "From barren but resource-heavy ice balls, to Goldilocks planets with life".

"As I said at the top if you adored it good for you, you won, but many who actually played it didn't love it as much as they were hoping to. That's entirely fair criticism of any game. I don't think it was a bad game, I had some fun with it, but it was bad for a Bethesda game."

I agree with you. Nobody has to like the game, it wasn't perfect, and no game will be loved by everyone. Some people have fair criticism about problems they encountered, that I didn't, but it doesn't make them less real.

Where I disagree is about Bethesda misleading players, as there was in-depth videos, interviews, news, all pre-launch talking about almost every aspect of the game. I went in already knowing of all those limitations. So I don't feel I was misled.

"Except virtually every other game this gen supporting 60fps and many looking a lot better to boot."

Yeah, but my point is again about it being misleading.

Redfall have shown every single gameplay at 60fps and only a week before launch said the game would run at 30fps on Xbox.

Starfield from the day they announced had all gameplays at 30fps on youtube, all of them. Not a single one before the patch had 60fps. So that's what I meant with expectation. I expect 30fps because that was all they shown.

I expected Redfall to be 60fps because that was what they shown, but Redfall team misled players.

Re: Starfield Gets Major Free Update & New Expansion Next Month, Alongside PS5 Release

eduscxbox

@TheGameThrifter I also played from day 1, have almost 300 hours in it and didn't find half of the issues you have. Played on Series X at first and finished the main campaing there and then continued on PC.

There was a small bug I experienced with the jetpack that they fixed shortly and it was it.

30fps was expected and known since the announcement, there were no reason to expect a higher framerate.

60fps update was welcome, on PC we can get even higher frames, up to 120fps with framegen, but 30fps was not a problem for the most part for me on the Series X.

There was indeed many load screens, but it loaded so fast it didn't bothered me much.

Having a city map now is an improvement for sure, but I didn't felt like it was an issue not having them. It is a QoL update, not something required to me personally.

Re: Starfield Gets Major Free Update & New Expansion Next Month, Alongside PS5 Release

eduscxbox

@themightyant The problem is that some people seem to have random expectations that come from nowhere.

Bethesda had hosted various in-depth videos about Starfield, explained detailed everything and shown the game exactly as it ran at launch. They hid nothing and everything they shown and said was in the game.

So why exactly where people expecting things that were never promised?

It is a total different situation from Cyberpunk, that there were promised core mechanics that wasn't on the game at first.

But Starfield, everything that was promised was delivered exactly as they said it would, so any expectations outside of what was promised makes no sense.

You can look and try to point it out but there is not a single thing that was promised by Bethesda or shown during the deep dives that wasn't in the game at launch.

People can play a game and dislike it, that's fine, you don't have to like what was shown and definitely doesn't have to like what you played.

What makes no sense is expect from the devs/game something they never promised, especially as they extensively shown how it was going to be, including the map limitations on the planet and not entering atmosphere, was that was clarified on the 1 hour long in-depth video.

PS: Performance issues in the open areas of citites were also noticeable in the in-depth videos, and all in-depth gameplay was shown running at 30fps, so even that wasn't hidden.

Re: Starfield Gets Major Free Update & New Expansion Next Month, Alongside PS5 Release

eduscxbox

@TheGameThrifter Those changes are additions, they're not 'fixing' the core gameplay, as it didn't need fixing. They're expanding it.

Only problem Starfield had was performance on some cities areas, that's it.

All the rest is optional improvement and didn't made the game 'a buggy mess'.

You and anybody else can dislike the game for various reasons, but saying it was a buggy mess is simply not true.

Re: Tech Journalist Predicts A Price Of 'At Least $1,000' For Xbox Project Helix

eduscxbox

Microsoft doesn't know the prices yet, it is one of the last things to be addressed in a product lifecycle and it depends on a variety of factors, not only cost, but also how much market share they want to achieve. $1000 is hard to market for the masses, so if they want that they can't go that high, so it all depends. It could be $700 or something around those lines, not sure tho.

Re: Xbox Head Doubles Down On The Importance Of Console, Says It's A 'Reference Experience'

eduscxbox

@Fiendish-Beaver Sure. But the point is: This is happening because they abandoned the console, so use those numbers to make a decision without shifting the strategy first, would be poor decision making.

This is an Xbox is a great campaign with bad execution. It is amazing they want to expand Xbox to other devices, the problem was that they did it while leaving Xbox console players behind, that was their mistake.

If they support the console properly and go into other devices as expansions around the console and not replacement of the console, it will be a success.

Re: Starfield Is Reportedly Launching For PS5 On April 7th, With Pre-Orders Starting This Month

eduscxbox

@Balaam_ Lol. Sony is the one publisher who can get away with anything they put out, even bugs in their games are forgiven by both players and media. I must remind that before the major failure even concord was being praised by the gaming media.

The same media who called Driveclub 'Forza Killer' and Killzone Shadowfall "Halo Killer". And I don't mean those are bad games, I actually loved Driveclub, but don't come saying 'Bethesda get away with stuff' when PS games have the obvious major bias in the whole gaming media and it is not even close.

Starfield launched feature-complete and well optimized for the most part considering the size of the game. Bethesda had hours-extensive videos explaining how the game would work and play and every single promise on those videos were in the game at launch.

Also, The "general consensus" that Starfield is a "bad game" comes simply from it being Xbox Exclusive, as soon as this ends, it will "become good".

And this is not just a rant by me, we have real-life proof. Just look at Avowed and how even the media (PC Gamer) said they "overlooked Avowed" and that "it is actually good" after the PS5 release. (Yeah, they did that)

People hatred towards Xbox has no limits, it even make great games be trashed just for the sake of it.

Would Bethesda released Starfield multiplatform exactly as-is, Starfield would be considered a masterpiece by those same people that say the game is bad for the sake of it, as most of the criticism come either from people who haven't played the game and it is just parroting other's opinions or PlayStation players deep in flamewar more than anything else.

It doesn't mean the game is perfect and that everyone that played the game loved it, of course not, there are people who played and disliked, but they're not the majority of the people criticizing; they never are, for most games, it is always the parrots.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but when it comes to Xbox, people seem to skew the standards to whatever direction they can use to criticize the platform over something.

Re: Xbox's 'Pivot Away From Console' Had Been Failing And Questioned At Microsoft, Claims Report

eduscxbox

Why are people mixing up 'pivot away from console' with 'exclusive games'?!

Issue is not the exclusives. Xbox has no exclusive since 2016. The issue was that console was left aside in favor of PC and Cloud.

The problem wasn't the 'This is An Xbox' marketing either, problem was that Xbox consoles weren't part of that.

Main issue is the lack of support for the console. Would they keep supporting Series X|S and have done all the rest exactly the same there would be no problem by now.

Having said that... People, as always, are exaggerating on the scale and we are again at the 'Xbox is doomed' chant that pessimistic and haters are doing for 25 years now.

No, it is not doomed. It has a problem that can be fixed if handled well.

Remember, Xbox 360 had major hardware failures en mass with 3RL and people to this date say it was the best xbox generation ever.

Everything is fixable in this industry.

Re: Who Is Asha Sharma? A Look Back At The Career Of The New Xbox Boss

eduscxbox

@Romans12 Was Reggie Fills-Aime a gamer prior to be at Nintendo? Just look his career and what a greay job he did at NOA even with no prior background in gaming.

Matt Booty shutdown Tango(Moved by Microsoft CFO nonsense) and the next week said in a interview "Xbox need a japanese studio". He's definitely someone who must not lead the entire division.

Now getting outraged just because she's a woman?! What's wrong with you?

BTW, Sarah Bond is largely responsible for Game Pass successful expansion and Square-Exis current good relationship with Xbox.

Re: New Xbox Boss Makes Official Statement As She Takes Over From Phil Spencer

eduscxbox

@Millionski I'm just not judging her before she has the chance to prove herself. All we have now is her statement and I'm going with it for now. In six months we ser where Xbox will be and re-evaluate.

People are so triggered by AI that's all they can see. She being previously CoreAI business don't make her incapable of learning the industry and doing a great job.

Reggie Fills-Aime is a great example of that, having worker at VH1, Pizza Hut and Procter & Gamble prior to be at Nintendo. Not the first time in the industry.

Re: Bethesda Says Starfield's Next Update Will 'Change The Game' But 'It's Not Starfield 2.0'

eduscxbox

Great news! I don't think the game needed any fundamental change. It was great when released, and Shattared Space improved on that.

It doesn't need a complete overhaul like cyberpunk needed back in 2020.

I guess most of the complaints, including the 'Loading instead of entering the atmosphere like No Man's Sky' comes from people not realizing Starfield isn't a space simulation game like Star Citizen, it is not even a space game like No Man's Sky, it is a space-themed RPG.

It is a Bethesda RPG, just like Skyrim, themed in space. That's it.

Can't wait for the next update.

Re: Silent Hill: Townfall Not Coming To Xbox At Launch, Along With A Few Other State Of Play Titles

eduscxbox

As always, studios looking for ways to lose money. Final Fantasy team learned the hard way.

The only party who befits from exclusivity is Sony. Sony will see more PS5 sales, studio will lose sales, PS5 sales + Deal won't be enough to recoup costs and players won't hype as much when it finally (if ever) the game releases multiplatform.

Square-Enix did this with the first FF7 Remake and FF16 and regretted it so much they already announced Rebirth and the third game of the trilogy for Series X (If I am not wrong rebirth is already listed on Xbox Store).

Will be the same with Konami.

If even Kojima, who is highly praised (deservedly so) by PS players, couldn't keep Death Strading exclusive on PS5, I don't think konami or any other big studios will managed to.

Re: Xbox Series X|S Ranked 5th In List Of Platforms Developers Are Most Interested In

eduscxbox

1) “microsoft is not trying to win over PS and switch” - this is bad for us xbox console players that we ve been for 25 years. Only since 2024 and even 2025 it suddenly became irrelevant where you play and that everythint is an xbox.

I meant win over PS and Switch audience. They're going after new players, not existing players on other platforms.

2) Yes, we are all enthusiasts here, and so is all that conversation. Regular audience doesn't care if it runs windows or is a PC. It will worry about price (that we think will be high), but that doesn't make PS6 cheap automatically. So how much will price impact if competition is on par?

3) Steam OS has a best experience against the full Windows 11 on handhelds, We don't have the next-gen Full Xbox Experience to compare yet. That's what we have to wait and see.

4) Sure, Switch can be a good alternative for the Series S and some people might go there, but is not the massive exodus people are making out to be just because of the PC transition.

5) And why exactly are you expecting PS6 to be any cheaper than Xbox? PS6 will be as powerful as the next Xbox and will use custom hardware. PS5 Pro launched at $700. PS6 can easily launch at $999.

6) The only post I talked about profit was #69 and I was responding to another user.

7) Of course there is lots of Ifs, and so does your arguments, because of the same reason, the console haven't launched yet. All that is speculation, there is no Xbox PC yet, we don't know how optimized it will be. People are assuming all the worst based on Windows 11 in its current state but we will have to see the version that will go in those machines. Just like regular linux isn't even close to SteamOS experience for gaming.

Re: Xbox Series X|S Ranked 5th In List Of Platforms Developers Are Most Interested In

eduscxbox

@Millionski "The backlash to the brand is really high right now so whoever is with Nintendo or PS or with steam - they wont bother with all these xbox-PC."

Microsoft is not trying to win over PS and Switch players to their hardware, that makes no sense. If they were interested in that they wouldn't be releasing their games on PS5.

"By introducing all these xboxPCs at high prices you push existing customers away to the competition."

I'm not sure that would really push people away: https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/the-xbox-ally-x-is-already-selling-out-despite-its-beefy-price-tag-the-hype-is-real-says-microsoft

Also, here on PureXbox there was a pool about the maximum price people would pay on Next Xbox, and majority voted $1000. https://www.purexbox.com/features/talking-point-how-much-would-you-be-willing-to-spend-on-the-next-xbox-console

Let me just make it clear, it is not my opinion, just stating facts.

"You have a PC OS with better experience- steam Os that is launching this year."

We can't say that. We don't know how the experience will be when it launches. When Microsoft release that full Xbox Experience on PC we can compare.

"You have playstation and Nintendo already (and switch 2 also could be a good option for someone who played on series s)."

Switch target audience is not the same as Xbox/PS. And no, and not talking about being "for kids" I own a switch as well, but for total different games than I bought Xbox for. Not the same thing at all. Yes, we have games like Cyberpunk on switch 2, but how many people bought it to play it and how many bought to play Mario Kart World? It is not the same market.

PlayStation is on the same market, but there is one thing people forget when talking about migration to another platform: library.

Some people will have hundreds of games on their library, either physical or digital, it is not so simple to switch away from a platform like that. It is too much investment and it would likely cost less to buy the new Xbox anyways.

"And since you are so concerned about their profits"-- I'll stop it right there. I am not. All my points previously were as a player, not as an investor. My point about profit was just me responding to another user.

As a player I can't see nothing wrong with Microsoft approach, if they make all Xbox One / Xbox Series native games + Backwards Compatible titles run on Windows (which they said they will) I don't really mind if they change the console OS.