The reality is prices have risen for everything everywhere. While I am not a fan of rising prices the reality is that consoles are not immune to the price increases.
At the end of the day I will keep buying XB. I like Microsoft although they have made many mis-steps with XB, I feel it is on the right track now.
@dreadful I am enjoying South of Midnight, others may not, but I am. I also enjoyed Starfield. And I liked this last year's Call of Duty. Like what you want, MS is delivering some pretty good games in my opinion.
@andrewsqual They are doing this to make sure their gaming unit is as profitable as possible. Sales of their games on other platforms are ensuring high profitability on the games they make.
@dreadful
South of Midnight is a new franchise, a solid game, and entirely Microsoft built. It may not be everyone's game, but to me it has broad appeal. I hope they do more games that take chances like this one did.
I am glad that MS is being the "bigger man" and promoting freedom of choice of platforms. I feel that exclusives do not unify gamers and that games should be available on as many platforms as possible. As a consumer this is good no matter how you look at it. The increased revenues across platforms allow them to keep funding their studios to make the games.
The numbers don't lie. Microsoft is succeeding really well in gaming. I think MS has to stay the course. Continue delivering great games through all its studios/publishers and find a way to sell more hardware. I am sure MS is happy with its gaming revenues.
@themightyant To be fair Lost Odyssey was a 2007-8 released game in the 360 era. It only stands to reason that a game developed 18 years later would be more complete since it was inspired by Lost Odyssey.
Is the story as good as Lost Odyssey? I found the Lost Odyssey story was one of the best stories I ever experienced in a video game.
I disagree with the logic that because subscription services have gone flat, they are not the future of gaming. I do agree that there will be a mixed model, but subscription services will always be central to gaming.
The vendors need a way to fund the cloud services that run gaming. This is best suited to value added subscriptions.
What gaming needs is new and innovative game experiences that bring more people into the gaming community. I haven't seen very many new experiences that make me think, "wow, this would appeal to people that currently don't play games".
As for getting more revenue from existing gamers, I think gaming is a completely optional expense people incur. People will only pay so much for completely optional expenses. And I feel I am pretty well off, but I cap my gaming spend each year. There is no way I will increase my spend, and I only buy maybe 1-3 games per year at full price. Everything else has to be at least 70% to get me to pay attention to it.
@donv2135
The only constant is change. I stream video and music services almost exclusively now, I wonder how long until games are the same way.
I still think there is room for consumer devices, but more and more they will become more generic and more commodity based. They will co-process with the cloud and everything will have to be online connected.
I remember the fiasco around Crackdown 3. I know its multi-player stunk, but the idea was in the forming stage. Today, I think in gaming the cloud vs local processing model is still forming, but I see it starting to take shape.
Eventually they will get the right balance in place for cloud vs. local processing. Then local consumer computing devices will become more generic.
I have XSX with blu-ray drive, I have literally many thousands of disc based media from OG XB, X360, XBO, blu-ray, DVD, and CD.
My drives and media collect dust 24 x 7 x 365. The only time I pull out discs is to play OG XB and X360 games that I have not purchased digitally on my OG XB and X360.
For movies and TV I subscribe to services or buy through MS Store to play on Films & TV. For music I have a family Spotify subscription. For games I have been all digital since early in the XBO generation. Would probably never go back to physical media.
@themightyant Whoever purchases Ubisoft or IPs from Ubisoft there are going to be job losses. Downsizing will either happen before or after they are taken over/divided up. That is the reality of the situation.
I also disagree with the comment from Shawn Layden. Size does not define whether companies are too big to manage. Apple, MS, Google, Amazon, and Tencent are massive companies. Personally, I don't like large companies because they can control the market, but in technology this is a norm as a industry part becomes more mature. And gaming whether gamers like it or not is becoming a more mature industry.
Gone are the days of extreme graphical leaps and new genres of games appearing because of new technology advances. We are in the days of maturing tools and incremental technology change. Until the holodeck becomes a reality, gaming is going to stay very similar to what it is today.
@Hexamex-Tex I agree that the next XB should be a gaming PC with emulation/compatibility for all XB games, but I think that it is critically important that they stick to the simplicity of the console UI. It should run games and allow apps but within the confines of the console UI as it is or evolves to by then.
I would consider it a fail if it had a desktop, start menu, taskbar, etc. It needs to boot and look and function like a console. Besides price that is why gamers buy consoles, they also don't want the drudgery of clicking around a PC.
Ideally for me, I would like to buy a Windows PC and be able to configure it as a console just by clicking a setting in the start menu, then next time I boot it, it runs in console mode. And there should be a setting to bring it back to PC mode in the console UI. That way I can decide what I want the device to be, and if I can afford to and want to pay $5,000 for a super souped up console they are helping me do that.
Personally, I would like to see more incremental console releases every two to three years rather than every 5-8 years. There is constant innovation available. Rather than controlling it, the console world should embrace constant innovation.
@InheritNegative The alternative is people surf You Tube, True Achievements, and other sites that can help them do what they want in a game...
All MS is doing here is making it so you don't have to switch to another UI to get the info you want. This can also be very helpful for new gamers that don't understand the game genre. Not everyone picks up a game and is ready to play it and have fun. Sometimes by looking at things like You Tube videos and such you understand the genre better and learn to have fun with it.
I do see what you are saying but to me it is just another option. I doubt they will make you have to use it.
I think that this year's handheld will be kind of an experiment to see what works and does not work. I expect the full effort to be when they release their own handheld XB device.
Personally I would love to see all the Microsoft Surface devices have a button on them to switch to console mode and then back to PC mode. I really like the simplicity of consoles, but I want to be able to flip them to a PC for other activities + work. I have no clue why MS has not come up with such a solution.
@Elbow I think MS has been very clear that they are trying to sell there games to as many gamers as possible regardless of platform. This was one of the pillars of opposition to MS buying ABK. The other pillar of the opposition was their lay-offs right after the acquisition. But, as they stated that was a norm at the time through the industry.
I think it would be difficult especially with a Republican president for the USA regulators to stop another big deal. Other countries would have difficulty justifying opposition with the way MS has behaved since the acquisition of ABK.
To me, molding PC and console gaming together as one is inevitable. This helps ensure games will ship on XB because there will be no technical barriers to ship on the platform.
I consider 360 the best console I have ever owned. It released a year before PS3 and lasted right beside PS3 the entire way. Some people may get down on the console about RRoD, but MS replaced the one RRoD I had and I never had a problem after.
To me, 360 blazed the trail for all subsequent consoles. It was the first real online console, introduced gamer profiles, could run cutting edge games at the time, and was the last decently priced console.
1) Run every XB and PC game.
2) A really good UI making it like a console experience. Simple management.
3) Better then current high powered handhelds at battery life.
I don't see how you can pack a powerful device into a small high resolution screen at a low price. It has to be a premium device not a budget device to meet its technical goals. It will price a lot of people out, but unfortunately that is how it will be.
More options for gamers. Each person can decide whether they want one themselves or not. Me, I spend a lot of time travelling in planes, ferries, and vehicles so I will definitely pick one up. My current ROG Ally gets a lot of good use.
I would say MP depends. If they were to release e-day for the holidays with MP I would say it would be fine just being the campaigns. Then build previous Gears MP into E-Day MP.
@neillaw
I am not sure what your comment is getting at. It is a stated estimate that 6 mln people played the game. As with almost every game there are a significant amount of people that choose not to continue to play it after 15 minutes. I heard a stat once that less than 20% of gamers ever finish a campaign in any game.
It is the same as saying an estimated billion people ate at McDonald's last year. Is that inclusive of people like me who didn't like the food?
I have no problem with the number and amount of games MS is releasing. I do want to see the games move from 8/10 to 9's and 10' though. If it take more time I am fine with that.
There are a lot of AAA studios with 5+ year development cycles now. That is how the game industry is for a new AAA game based on a new/highly updated engine and with original content.
@somnambulance I don't see this as much different then the film industry. Movie of the year is usually something not a lot of people actually watched during its theatre run or didn't even release in theatres. The live services in movies are the constant sequels for popular franchises.
To me there is art and there is sports gaming. The story/campaign games are the art and the live services and multi-player games are the sports. Story/campaign games may not be much in the market but they are still worth making and can be profitable. Just not as much as sports gaming.
I once worked for a major music publisher. They gambled on a a lot of music acts because only 1 out of 30 signed would make money and 1 out of every 200 signed would make enough money to justify the publisher staying in business. The problem is that no one can ever figure out which one is the 1 in 30 or one in 200. So, they had to take a chance on a lot of acts. It is the same in gaming. There are not a lot of games that make a lot of money, but the ones that do are justification for everyone else to make their games.
I think Microsoft is well positioned for go-forward gaming success. Between UE5 and other purchased publishers/developers MS has great tech to make games. And they invested heavy in Live Services so that is also in great shape, Not to mention gaming infrastructure like the cloud, gamer profiles, and streaming.
I just hope MS starts to stay the course as they currently are moving towards. And not make yet another major direction change. It is good to be agile, but a brand is built on a reputation, and a reputation is built by being consistent in what you do.
I think the last few MS games have been pretty good from a quality perspective. They could be better I think but overall, most of their new games are playable.
If they want their review scores to increase I think they have to ship games in a bit better first day state though. To me that is the difference between 7-8.5 out of 10 and 9-10's.
I like the direction MS is headed but, they need to sustain the direction for years and not keep changing it. MS has tried things and often gave up too early on some stuff and way too late on others. I think the choice to bundle Kinect with XB One was a bold move but it was also a brutal failure. It increased the price of the console too much.
I was hoping that MS would rotate development between Rise of, Age of, Halo Wars, and Gears Tactics IPs. Not to mention I would like to see another Toy Soldiers style and a Japanese style RTS game as well from them. It would give them a six year cycle for each franchise. Which I think is about right for these types of games.
The problem in the RTS genre is that RTS games that tend to follow profound evolution (single person to fully modern society) do really well, but other RTS style games don't seem to do as well. aka Civilization and Age of games seem really popular but Gears and Halo not so much.
@Kaloudz I agree with your post entirely but there is also another part to the story which is that publishers/developers for too long have shipped incomplete or bug ridden games to gaming customers. I don't think a lot of people would push back on the costs so much if gaming publishers/developers shipped relatively bug free and complete games on day one. I for one, have been seriously tainted by games shipping in a much less than ideal state. Put out quality content on a consistent basis and I would buy a significant amount more. Right now it is almost like gambling when you buy a game on day one... Is this going to be a treat or a major disappointment because the publisher/developer brought it out a year too early?
I would expect expect that further innovations in networking and cloud co-processing will make streaming a primary way to play games as consoles continue to become more and more expensive. The economics improve a lot for a struggling family to stream rather than buy a console. Consoles had two advantages in the past. 1) A dedicated gaming/entertainment UI, 2) Cost made consoles the go to gaming/entertainment device over PCs. With MS making every device capable of having a dedicated gaming/entertainment UI and the economics of consoles becoming more and more expensive, consoles are losing their advantages quickly.
The advantage of streaming though is becoming greater and greater. As networks get faster streaming becomes more viable. And not needing to buy a new dedicated device every 3-8 years is very attractive from a cost perspective. How does a family struggling with constant inflation justify a $600-900 console over any streaming device that can connect to the Internet? Sure there will be people that take gaming seriously and want the dedicated gear just like any other hobby/sport, but then there is the 95% of people that gaming/entertainment is just one of many hobbies they do and the less they pay for it the better.
I expect by the end of the next generation not a lot of people will care about consoles anymore. They will be seen as costly and redundant. Most people will stream games, and then the rest will buy PCs for the dedicated experience. If not next generation, the generation after. It is not a matter of if consoles will be replaced by streaming it is when.
Consoles have had a good run. But they are coming near the end of their cycle as a technology that people will want. I have gamed for decades and my preference is to play campaign/story, single player, or co-op games. Streaming is pretty much there for me to do that without having to buy dedicated console gear. I still primarily play on my console devices, but I am seriously consider whether I need to buy a next console or not.
@Medic_alert It is just logic really. If you target the lowest platform with your development then the rest of the platforms should be a breeze.
Developers who target the strongest platform first are just really dumb. It is like saying "Let's build a Ferrari spec and put it in a Toyota Corolla". Hmmmmmm why didn't that work?
@Prestige-worldwide Agreed. But, this is an XB site (In fact PureXbox lol). If people are no longer interested or feel victimized by XB, I would encourage them to "move on" and join the PS or whatever community they want to join next.
People can whine all day, but with how successful MS appears to be with multi-platforming their games I don't see them caring too much what these people are saying. Maybe, it is time they move on and switch to the community they are going to next rather than making whining and toxic posts here.
I would also encourage Pure Xbox to no longer act as if every game that releases on another platform is somehow news. MS is clear. They have no sacred franchises that they won't ship on other devices. To me, these articles qualify as stoking the fire more than being actual news. Let's talk about Doom, Avowed, and the rest of the games we are getting this year. Not a bunch of people crying after decisions have been made.
@Valhura Actions should be based on facts not emotions.
Your post is void of facts other than it sounds like you don't like MS first party content and I can agree that MS was light on good content both last generation and to start this generation.
If you are not getting an XB next generation then I am not sure why you feel it necessary to comment on this site anymore. Personally, if I was leaving XB next gen I wouldn't care about coming back to post here.
@IOI
I don't know how we can be a victim when nothing has been taken from us. The exact opposite, now that AKB is a MS company, their games come to GamePass on Day One now.
The only people killing the XB platform are people who get overly dramatic about MS shipping games on other platforms.
I really liked listening to the whole info in that discussion.
He also likened Sony to HBO, MS to Netflix, and Nintendo to Disney. That makes sense.
He also said that none of these vendors make their money on the consoles. Again, that is known to be true. It is the content and services where the money is made.
@TanaDax
I never trust the advertising. Been in gaming for many, many generations and every single one of the vendors literally lie in their marketing. That is a big problem now-a-days. People trust social media and marketing more then the trust looking for facts and making choices based true facts. That requires research, correlating truth to reality, having trust with verification, and determining what is real.
I have a few rules when it comes to consoles and what I hear:
1) A game is not real until it has at least a release year within the current year (Even then you may see a 6 month delay... aka Avowed).
2) Console marketing is all BS. Best console ever, best performance leap, resolution games will run at, it is all BS. Their statements are for games like Pac-man not the AAA console pushing titles.
3) Until a game releases and it is known to be stable for a few months, I don't buy it. Too many times I have been burned by a release corrupting a save or the game just being a mess on release.
@wildcat_kickz And MS get some extra profits, the game will get more followers, and probably some money back to Machine Games so they can make another great game. Wins across the board.
@JustinTimberlake To me the difference between PS and XB is not hardware but the cost and experience of the system.
First, on cost. I feel like XB costs me less than PS would with GamePass, the general price of games, and I can buy the hardware cheaper.
Second, on the experience. I like XB online experience better, I think the profiles/gamerscore model is better, and I like the dashboard better than PS.
I don't like all those on PS, therefore I choose XB. To me game selection is only one aspect of owning a console.
@InJeffable
I think Judgement was a really good multi-player and co-op game, but as a campaign story I really felt it was weak sauce. One, it was really short, and two it felt like they took multi-player games types and strung them together to make a campaign story.
I think the best Gears stories were the first three. I felt four was a milking exercise, and I felt 5 boldly tried new things that didn't work the best but at least they tried.
I hope E-Day goes more back to Gears roots. Gritty story, gritty and technical gameplay, and awesome multi-player where horde mode is really, really fun!
I think the S is a very good option. I have one on a 1080p TV I own. Why would I buy an X for a TV that can only do 1080p. You look at most TVs below 40" and there is very few that do 4k. Yes, PC monitors go 4k but TV wise, only a few.
I think MS did fumble it a bit on the CPU, memory, GPU balance, but generally this was a good start. And like Phil said, there are a lot of devices where games run, and many of them are a lot less than an S. Games are built to run on almost every hardware configuration now.
I would love to see another S in the next generation. There are many cases where I would buy it. Heck I would love to see an XB hardware bundle... Buy the next X, S, and handheld in a boxed bundle and get $100 off. Would buy it no questions asked.
If gamers want to talk about something and the gaming news wants to pick up on a cause relentlessly how about any of the following:
1) Microtransactions ruining what would've been a great game.
2) Why games ship day one as flawed messes seemingly void of any level of testing.
3) Why isn't Sony and Nintendo shipping games on XB?
4) Have you bought a new game on day one lately? Have you seen the price? coughcough.
5) Why is online required for almost every game now?
I could go on and on... MS shipping their games on other platforms is not the biggest issue in the gaming or XB world.
I can see here that a lot of people are passionate on this topic. But, at the end of the day I think MS is doing the right thing. I am sure they are doing it for their own profit, but the reality is that this breaks down the, "I need to buy this device to play a certain game". I would expect both Nintendo and Sony shareholders to see this and say, "why aren't you doing this too because we could make more money?". I would be willing to say that within about 5 years, there won't be exclusives anymore on any platform. The world will have moved on from something that was anti-consumer and created a whole world of "console wars".
People that cling to this will just be disappointed in the same way that gaming has gone to digital distribution and microtransactions are here to stay. The reality is that these things make publishers more money and the reality of shipping games on as many platforms as possible does the same.
I would also think that in 10 years there won't be consoles anymore. Gamers will either stream from the cloud or dedicated console devices will be replaced by much more flexible PCs. PCs don't have near the limitations of consoles and they don't have the same problems they used to when installing games. I can setup a single PC with a lot of different multi-monitor configurations to play games. Consoles don't give near that capability.
This is what I hate about this generation. The storage devices just don't have enough space. I would love to have my entire collection on a few hard drives connected to my XB. But, no, you have to have a lot of games on the special storage, and a good portion of those games are over 100 Gb each. NVMe is great, but we need 10 Tb storage sizes at a decent cost for it to be useful.
@Smackosynthesis
Microsoft is far from the number one sellers of PCs yet they still sell Surface PCs. There are a bunch of different reasons why a company chooses to be in a marketplace selling their products.
I for one will pick up the next XB. Their multi-platform game strategy does not affect my the choice. I will also buy PS6 and Switch 2. But, my primary console will be XB for the foreseeable future because I like the platform, its services, and there are a lot of great games on the platform. Nintendo platform and services are just poor, and I do not like PS services and platform as much as XB.
This generation may be the last console generation anyhow. I expect within the next 10 years most games will switch to streaming and people will just buy TVs and those TVs will be designed to stream games really well.
Comments 874
Re: Talking Point: Would You Still Buy An Xbox At Microsoft's 2025 Prices?
The reality is prices have risen for everything everywhere. While I am not a fan of rising prices the reality is that consoles are not immune to the price increases.
At the end of the day I will keep buying XB. I like Microsoft although they have made many mis-steps with XB, I feel it is on the right track now.
Re: Talking Point: With Forza Horizon 5 Now On PS5, Do You Expect To See Horizon 6 Anytime Soon?
I doubt we will see FH6 until at least a year after Fable ships.
Re: Xbox Achieves Record-Breaking Results In Latest Earnings Report
@dreadful
I am enjoying South of Midnight, others may not, but I am. I also enjoyed Starfield. And I liked this last year's Call of Duty. Like what you want, MS is delivering some pretty good games in my opinion.
Re: Microsoft CEO Announces 'Top Publisher' Milestone For Xbox Games On PS5
@andrewsqual
They are doing this to make sure their gaming unit is as profitable as possible. Sales of their games on other platforms are ensuring high profitability on the games they make.
Re: Xbox Achieves Record-Breaking Results In Latest Earnings Report
@dreadful
South of Midnight is a new franchise, a solid game, and entirely Microsoft built. It may not be everyone's game, but to me it has broad appeal. I hope they do more games that take chances like this one did.
Re: Microsoft CEO Announces 'Top Publisher' Milestone For Xbox Games On PS5
I am glad that MS is being the "bigger man" and promoting freedom of choice of platforms. I feel that exclusives do not unify gamers and that games should be available on as many platforms as possible. As a consumer this is good no matter how you look at it. The increased revenues across platforms allow them to keep funding their studios to make the games.
Re: Xbox Achieves Record-Breaking Results In Latest Earnings Report
The numbers don't lie. Microsoft is succeeding really well in gaming. I think MS has to stay the course. Continue delivering great games through all its studios/publishers and find a way to sell more hardware. I am sure MS is happy with its gaming revenues.
Re: Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Is Reminding People Of This Classic Xbox 360 JRPG
@themightyant
To be fair Lost Odyssey was a 2007-8 released game in the 360 era. It only stands to reason that a game developed 18 years later would be more complete since it was inspired by Lost Odyssey.
Is the story as good as Lost Odyssey? I found the Lost Odyssey story was one of the best stories I ever experienced in a video game.
Re: Subscriptions Like Xbox Game Pass 'Not The Future Of Gaming', Says Analyst
I disagree with the logic that because subscription services have gone flat, they are not the future of gaming. I do agree that there will be a mixed model, but subscription services will always be central to gaming.
The vendors need a way to fund the cloud services that run gaming. This is best suited to value added subscriptions.
What gaming needs is new and innovative game experiences that bring more people into the gaming community. I haven't seen very many new experiences that make me think, "wow, this would appeal to people that currently don't play games".
As for getting more revenue from existing gamers, I think gaming is a completely optional expense people incur. People will only pay so much for completely optional expenses. And I feel I am pretty well off, but I cap my gaming spend each year. There is no way I will increase my spend, and I only buy maybe 1-3 games per year at full price. Everything else has to be at least 70% to get me to pay attention to it.
Re: Poll: As Forza Horizon 5 Cruises To PS5, Are You Still Playing It On Xbox?
I continue to play most of the FH games where they still work. I love the series and just do a few races at a time to keep it fresh.
Re: OG Xbox Creator Shares His Thoughts On The State Of The Brand In 2025
@donv2135
The only constant is change. I stream video and music services almost exclusively now, I wonder how long until games are the same way.
I still think there is room for consumer devices, but more and more they will become more generic and more commodity based. They will co-process with the cloud and everything will have to be online connected.
I remember the fiasco around Crackdown 3. I know its multi-player stunk, but the idea was in the forming stage. Today, I think in gaming the cloud vs local processing model is still forming, but I see it starting to take shape.
Eventually they will get the right balance in place for cloud vs. local processing. Then local consumer computing devices will become more generic.
Re: Talking Point: Will Any Next-Gen Xbox Have A Disc Drive?
I have XSX with blu-ray drive, I have literally many thousands of disc based media from OG XB, X360, XBO, blu-ray, DVD, and CD.
My drives and media collect dust 24 x 7 x 365. The only time I pull out discs is to play OG XB and X360 games that I have not purchased digitally on my OG XB and X360.
For movies and TV I subscribe to services or buy through MS Store to play on Films & TV. For music I have a family Spotify subscription. For games I have been all digital since early in the XBO generation. Would probably never go back to physical media.
Re: Xbox Buying Ubisoft Would Be An Unwise Move, Suggests Former PlayStation Boss
@themightyant
Whoever purchases Ubisoft or IPs from Ubisoft there are going to be job losses. Downsizing will either happen before or after they are taken over/divided up. That is the reality of the situation.
I also disagree with the comment from Shawn Layden. Size does not define whether companies are too big to manage. Apple, MS, Google, Amazon, and Tencent are massive companies. Personally, I don't like large companies because they can control the market, but in technology this is a norm as a industry part becomes more mature. And gaming whether gamers like it or not is becoming a more mature industry.
Gone are the days of extreme graphical leaps and new genres of games appearing because of new technology advances. We are in the days of maturing tools and incremental technology change. Until the holodeck becomes a reality, gaming is going to stay very similar to what it is today.
Re: Xbox Will Bring 'A Lot More' Exclusives To PS5 And Switch 2 In 2025
@Hexamex-Tex
I agree that the next XB should be a gaming PC with emulation/compatibility for all XB games, but I think that it is critically important that they stick to the simplicity of the console UI. It should run games and allow apps but within the confines of the console UI as it is or evolves to by then.
I would consider it a fail if it had a desktop, start menu, taskbar, etc. It needs to boot and look and function like a console. Besides price that is why gamers buy consoles, they also don't want the drudgery of clicking around a PC.
Ideally for me, I would like to buy a Windows PC and be able to configure it as a console just by clicking a setting in the start menu, then next time I boot it, it runs in console mode. And there should be a setting to bring it back to PC mode in the console UI. That way I can decide what I want the device to be, and if I can afford to and want to pay $5,000 for a super souped up console they are helping me do that.
Re: Xbox Features 'Steam' Games In New Mockup UI Image From GDC
@AndroidBango
And that is bad for gamers how? Maybe bad for MS profit margins, but definitely not bad for gamers.
Re: Talking Point: Is It Too Early To Release A New Xbox Console In 2027?
Personally, I would like to see more incremental console releases every two to three years rather than every 5-8 years. There is constant innovation available. Rather than controlling it, the console world should embrace constant innovation.
Re: Phil Spencer 'Excited' About Xbox Copilot, An AI Tool That Helps Players Finish Games
@InheritNegative
The alternative is people surf You Tube, True Achievements, and other sites that can help them do what they want in a game...
All MS is doing here is making it so you don't have to switch to another UI to get the info you want. This can also be very helpful for new gamers that don't understand the game genre. Not everyone picks up a game and is ready to play it and have fun. Sometimes by looking at things like You Tube videos and such you understand the genre better and learn to have fun with it.
I do see what you are saying but to me it is just another option. I doubt they will make you have to use it.
Re: Opinion: The 2025 Xbox Handheld Could Have A Major Impact On The Brand's Future
I think that this year's handheld will be kind of an experiment to see what works and does not work. I expect the full effort to be when they release their own handheld XB device.
Personally I would love to see all the Microsoft Surface devices have a button on them to switch to console mode and then back to PC mode. I really like the simplicity of consoles, but I want to be able to flip them to a PC for other activities + work. I have no clue why MS has not come up with such a solution.
Re: Microsoft Has Reportedly Discussed Acquiring IP From Ubisoft
@Elbow
I think MS has been very clear that they are trying to sell there games to as many gamers as possible regardless of platform. This was one of the pillars of opposition to MS buying ABK. The other pillar of the opposition was their lay-offs right after the acquisition. But, as they stated that was a norm at the time through the industry.
I think it would be difficult especially with a Republican president for the USA regulators to stop another big deal. Other countries would have difficulty justifying opposition with the way MS has behaved since the acquisition of ABK.
Re: Talking Point: If The Next-Gen Xbox Is More 'PC-Like', Will You Still Buy It?
To me, molding PC and console gaming together as one is inevitable. This helps ensure games will ship on XB because there will be no technical barriers to ship on the platform.
Re: Random: 20 Years Later, The Xbox 360 Is Still Finding New Fans In 2025
I consider 360 the best console I have ever owned. It released a year before PS3 and lasted right beside PS3 the entire way. Some people may get down on the console about RRoD, but MS replaced the one RRoD I had and I never had a problem after.
To me, 360 blazed the trail for all subsequent consoles. It was the first real online console, introduced gamer profiles, could run cutting edge games at the time, and was the last decently priced console.
Re: Microsoft Has Reportedly Discussed Acquiring IP From Ubisoft
Microsoft should just buy the whole company. Quit screwing around with buying only certain IPs.
Re: Talking Point: Will Xbox Manage To Create 'Something Legendary' With The Next Halo?
I think the next Halo is the last really good shot the franchise at having a future. They have to get it right or 343 needs to go another direction.
Re: Five Things An Xbox Handheld Needs To Include When It Releases
1) Run every XB and PC game.
2) A really good UI making it like a console experience. Simple management.
3) Better then current high powered handhelds at battery life.
I don't see how you can pack a powerful device into a small high resolution screen at a low price. It has to be a premium device not a budget device to meet its technical goals. It will price a lot of people out, but unfortunately that is how it will be.
Re: Report: Xbox Handheld For 2025 Being Made By ASUS, Will Feature Console-Like Interface
More options for gamers. Each person can decide whether they want one themselves or not. Me, I spend a lot of time travelling in planes, ferries, and vehicles so I will definitely pick one up. My current ROG Ally gets a lot of good use.
Re: Multiple 'Gears Collection' Rumours Now Suggesting PVP Could Be Skipped Entirely
I would say MP depends. If they were to release e-day for the holidays with MP I would say it would be fine just being the campaigns. Then build previous Gears MP into E-Day MP.
Re: Avowed Estimated To Reach 6 Million Players In First Month On Xbox & PC
@neillaw
I am not sure what your comment is getting at. It is a stated estimate that 6 mln people played the game. As with almost every game there are a significant amount of people that choose not to continue to play it after 15 minutes. I heard a stat once that less than 20% of gamers ever finish a campaign in any game.
It is the same as saying an estimated billion people ate at McDonald's last year. Is that inclusive of people like me who didn't like the food?
Re: Xbox Says It's Got A 'Bunch Of Stuff' It Hasn't Even Announced Yet
I have no problem with the number and amount of games MS is releasing. I do want to see the games move from 8/10 to 9's and 10' though. If it take more time I am fine with that.
There are a lot of AAA studios with 5+ year development cycles now. That is how the game industry is for a new AAA game based on a new/highly updated engine and with original content.
Re: Xbox & PlayStation Owners Are Obsessed With Live Service Games Right Now
@somnambulance
I don't see this as much different then the film industry. Movie of the year is usually something not a lot of people actually watched during its theatre run or didn't even release in theatres. The live services in movies are the constant sequels for popular franchises.
To me there is art and there is sports gaming. The story/campaign games are the art and the live services and multi-player games are the sports. Story/campaign games may not be much in the market but they are still worth making and can be profitable. Just not as much as sports gaming.
I once worked for a major music publisher. They gambled on a a lot of music acts because only 1 out of 30 signed would make money and 1 out of every 200 signed would make enough money to justify the publisher staying in business. The problem is that no one can ever figure out which one is the 1 in 30 or one in 200. So, they had to take a chance on a lot of acts. It is the same in gaming. There are not a lot of games that make a lot of money, but the ones that do are justification for everyone else to make their games.
Re: How Microsoft Managed Xbox Brand 'Is Not My F**king Fault', Says OG Xbox Creator
I think Microsoft is well positioned for go-forward gaming success. Between UE5 and other purchased publishers/developers MS has great tech to make games. And they invested heavy in Live Services so that is also in great shape, Not to mention gaming infrastructure like the cloud, gamer profiles, and streaming.
I just hope MS starts to stay the course as they currently are moving towards. And not make yet another major direction change. It is good to be agile, but a brand is built on a reputation, and a reputation is built by being consistent in what you do.
Re: Microsoft CEO Commits To Producing 'Great Quality Games' As Xbox Expands
I think the last few MS games have been pretty good from a quality perspective. They could be better I think but overall, most of their new games are playable.
If they want their review scores to increase I think they have to ship games in a bit better first day state though. To me that is the difference between 7-8.5 out of 10 and 9-10's.
I like the direction MS is headed but, they need to sustain the direction for years and not keep changing it. MS has tried things and often gave up too early on some stuff and way too late on others. I think the choice to bundle Kinect with XB One was a bold move but it was also a brutal failure. It increased the price of the console too much.
Re: Talking Point: Five Years On, Would You Want To See A Gears Tactics 2?
I was hoping that MS would rotate development between Rise of, Age of, Halo Wars, and Gears Tactics IPs. Not to mention I would like to see another Toy Soldiers style and a Japanese style RTS game as well from them. It would give them a six year cycle for each franchise. Which I think is about right for these types of games.
The problem in the RTS genre is that RTS games that tend to follow profound evolution (single person to fully modern society) do really well, but other RTS style games don't seem to do as well. aka Civilization and Age of games seem really popular but Gears and Halo not so much.
Re: Marvel Rivals Publisher Confirms Mass US Layoffs In New Company Statement
@Kaloudz
I agree with your post entirely but there is also another part to the story which is that publishers/developers for too long have shipped incomplete or bug ridden games to gaming customers. I don't think a lot of people would push back on the costs so much if gaming publishers/developers shipped relatively bug free and complete games on day one. I for one, have been seriously tainted by games shipping in a much less than ideal state. Put out quality content on a consistent basis and I would buy a significant amount more. Right now it is almost like gambling when you buy a game on day one... Is this going to be a treat or a major disappointment because the publisher/developer brought it out a year too early?
Re: Phil Spencer Says Xbox Is Done Trying To Convince PS5 & Switch Players To Move Over
@FraserG
So, what you are saying is that all PXB cares about clicks rather than gaming journalism. OK. Duly noted.
Re: Xbox Reporter Says Series X|S Successor Has Been 'Fully Approved' By Microsoft
I would expect expect that further innovations in networking and cloud co-processing will make streaming a primary way to play games as consoles continue to become more and more expensive. The economics improve a lot for a struggling family to stream rather than buy a console. Consoles had two advantages in the past. 1) A dedicated gaming/entertainment UI, 2) Cost made consoles the go to gaming/entertainment device over PCs. With MS making every device capable of having a dedicated gaming/entertainment UI and the economics of consoles becoming more and more expensive, consoles are losing their advantages quickly.
The advantage of streaming though is becoming greater and greater. As networks get faster streaming becomes more viable. And not needing to buy a new dedicated device every 3-8 years is very attractive from a cost perspective. How does a family struggling with constant inflation justify a $600-900 console over any streaming device that can connect to the Internet? Sure there will be people that take gaming seriously and want the dedicated gear just like any other hobby/sport, but then there is the 95% of people that gaming/entertainment is just one of many hobbies they do and the less they pay for it the better.
I expect by the end of the next generation not a lot of people will care about consoles anymore. They will be seen as costly and redundant. Most people will stream games, and then the rest will buy PCs for the dedicated experience. If not next generation, the generation after. It is not a matter of if consoles will be replaced by streaming it is when.
Consoles have had a good run. But they are coming near the end of their cycle as a technology that people will want. I have gamed for decades and my preference is to play campaign/story, single player, or co-op games. Streaming is pretty much there for me to do that without having to buy dedicated console gear. I still primarily play on my console devices, but I am seriously consider whether I need to buy a next console or not.
Re: Xbox Series S 'Greatly Helped' With Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 Development
@Medic_alert
It is just logic really. If you target the lowest platform with your development then the rest of the platforms should be a breeze.
Developers who target the strongest platform first are just really dumb. It is like saying "Let's build a Ferrari spec and put it in a Toyota Corolla". Hmmmmmm why didn't that work?
Re: Poll: How Would You Grade The First Month Of Xbox Game Pass In 2025?
This was a good January for me. Still playing through Indy, and now NG2 Black. And then next month Avowed. I have to try and keep up!
Re: Soapbox: As A Huge Forza Fan, I'm Fine With Horizon 5 Going To PS5
@Prestige-worldwide
Agreed. But, this is an XB site (In fact PureXbox lol). If people are no longer interested or feel victimized by XB, I would encourage them to "move on" and join the PS or whatever community they want to join next.
People can whine all day, but with how successful MS appears to be with multi-platforming their games I don't see them caring too much what these people are saying. Maybe, it is time they move on and switch to the community they are going to next rather than making whining and toxic posts here.
I would also encourage Pure Xbox to no longer act as if every game that releases on another platform is somehow news. MS is clear. They have no sacred franchises that they won't ship on other devices. To me, these articles qualify as stoking the fire more than being actual news. Let's talk about Doom, Avowed, and the rest of the games we are getting this year. Not a bunch of people crying after decisions have been made.
Re: Soapbox: As A Huge Forza Fan, I'm Fine With Horizon 5 Going To PS5
@Valhura
Actions should be based on facts not emotions.
Your post is void of facts other than it sounds like you don't like MS first party content and I can agree that MS was light on good content both last generation and to start this generation.
If you are not getting an XB next generation then I am not sure why you feel it necessary to comment on this site anymore. Personally, if I was leaving XB next gen I wouldn't care about coming back to post here.
Re: Soapbox: As A Huge Forza Fan, I'm Fine With Horizon 5 Going To PS5
@IOI
I don't know how we can be a victim when nothing has been taken from us. The exact opposite, now that AKB is a MS company, their games come to GamePass on Day One now.
The only people killing the XB platform are people who get overly dramatic about MS shipping games on other platforms.
Re: Former PlayStation Exec Says 'The Game Is Changing' As Xbox Goes Multiplatform
I really liked listening to the whole info in that discussion.
He also likened Sony to HBO, MS to Netflix, and Nintendo to Disney. That makes sense.
He also said that none of these vendors make their money on the consoles. Again, that is known to be true. It is the content and services where the money is made.
Re: Former PlayStation Exec Says 'The Game Is Changing' As Xbox Goes Multiplatform
@TanaDax
I never trust the advertising. Been in gaming for many, many generations and every single one of the vendors literally lie in their marketing. That is a big problem now-a-days. People trust social media and marketing more then the trust looking for facts and making choices based true facts. That requires research, correlating truth to reality, having trust with verification, and determining what is real.
I have a few rules when it comes to consoles and what I hear:
1) A game is not real until it has at least a release year within the current year (Even then you may see a 6 month delay... aka Avowed).
2) Console marketing is all BS. Best console ever, best performance leap, resolution games will run at, it is all BS. Their statements are for games like Pac-man not the AAA console pushing titles.
3) Until a game releases and it is known to be stable for a few months, I don't buy it. Too many times I have been burned by a release corrupting a save or the game just being a mess on release.
Re: Microsoft CEO Chimes In As Indiana Jones Surpasses Four Million Players On Xbox & PC
@wildcat_kickz
And MS get some extra profits, the game will get more followers, and probably some money back to Machine Games so they can make another great game. Wins across the board.
Re: Xbox Is 'Evolving' Rather Than 'Losing' Its Identity, Says Phil Spencer
@JustinTimberlake
To me the difference between PS and XB is not hardware but the cost and experience of the system.
First, on cost. I feel like XB costs me less than PS would with GamePass, the general price of games, and I can buy the hardware cheaper.
Second, on the experience. I like XB online experience better, I think the profiles/gamerscore model is better, and I like the dashboard better than PS.
I don't like all those on PS, therefore I choose XB. To me game selection is only one aspect of owning a console.
Re: 'People Can Fly' Becomes Official Co-Developer For Gears Of War: E-Day
@InJeffable
I think Judgement was a really good multi-player and co-op game, but as a campaign story I really felt it was weak sauce. One, it was really short, and two it felt like they took multi-player games types and strung them together to make a campaign story.
I think the best Gears stories were the first three. I felt four was a milking exercise, and I felt 5 boldly tried new things that didn't work the best but at least they tried.
I hope E-Day goes more back to Gears roots. Gritty story, gritty and technical gameplay, and awesome multi-player where horde mode is really, really fun!
Re: Xbox Boss Dismisses Idea Of Removing The Series S Parity Clause
I think the S is a very good option. I have one on a 1080p TV I own. Why would I buy an X for a TV that can only do 1080p. You look at most TVs below 40" and there is very few that do 4k. Yes, PC monitors go 4k but TV wise, only a few.
I think MS did fumble it a bit on the CPU, memory, GPU balance, but generally this was a good start. And like Phil said, there are a lot of devices where games run, and many of them are a lot less than an S. Games are built to run on almost every hardware configuration now.
I would love to see another S in the next generation. There are many cases where I would buy it. Heck I would love to see an XB hardware bundle... Buy the next X, S, and handheld in a boxed bundle and get $100 off. Would buy it no questions asked.
Re: Xbox Is 'Evolving' Rather Than 'Losing' Its Identity, Says Phil Spencer
@Isolte
Completely agree with you.
If gamers want to talk about something and the gaming news wants to pick up on a cause relentlessly how about any of the following:
1) Microtransactions ruining what would've been a great game.
2) Why games ship day one as flawed messes seemingly void of any level of testing.
3) Why isn't Sony and Nintendo shipping games on XB?
4) Have you bought a new game on day one lately? Have you seen the price? cough cough.
5) Why is online required for almost every game now?
I could go on and on... MS shipping their games on other platforms is not the biggest issue in the gaming or XB world.
Re: Xbox Will Continue To Ship More Games On PlayStation And Nintendo
I can see here that a lot of people are passionate on this topic. But, at the end of the day I think MS is doing the right thing. I am sure they are doing it for their own profit, but the reality is that this breaks down the, "I need to buy this device to play a certain game". I would expect both Nintendo and Sony shareholders to see this and say, "why aren't you doing this too because we could make more money?". I would be willing to say that within about 5 years, there won't be exclusives anymore on any platform. The world will have moved on from something that was anti-consumer and created a whole world of "console wars".
People that cling to this will just be disappointed in the same way that gaming has gone to digital distribution and microtransactions are here to stay. The reality is that these things make publishers more money and the reality of shipping games on as many platforms as possible does the same.
I would also think that in 10 years there won't be consoles anymore. Gamers will either stream from the cloud or dedicated console devices will be replaced by much more flexible PCs. PCs don't have near the limitations of consoles and they don't have the same problems they used to when installing games. I can setup a single PC with a lot of different multi-monitor configurations to play games. Consoles don't give near that capability.
Re: Talking Point: Xbox Series X|S Owners, How's Your Storage Looking In 2025?
This is what I hate about this generation. The storage devices just don't have enough space. I would love to have my entire collection on a few hard drives connected to my XB. But, no, you have to have a lot of games on the special storage, and a good portion of those games are over 100 Gb each. NVMe is great, but we need 10 Tb storage sizes at a decent cost for it to be useful.
Re: Microsoft's 'VP Of Next-Gen' Seems To Think That Xbox Console Hardware Isn't Under Threat
@Smackosynthesis
Microsoft is far from the number one sellers of PCs yet they still sell Surface PCs. There are a bunch of different reasons why a company chooses to be in a marketplace selling their products.
I for one will pick up the next XB. Their multi-platform game strategy does not affect my the choice. I will also buy PS6 and Switch 2. But, my primary console will be XB for the foreseeable future because I like the platform, its services, and there are a lot of great games on the platform. Nintendo platform and services are just poor, and I do not like PS services and platform as much as XB.
This generation may be the last console generation anyhow. I expect within the next 10 years most games will switch to streaming and people will just buy TVs and those TVs will be designed to stream games really well.