Comments 247

Re: Xbox Reminds Fans 'More Than 10 Major Releases' Are On The Way

ShadowofTwilight

@Kaloudz

To you it's dead but not to others. As someone who can't stand Western RPGs, thinks Bethesda are terrible, despised the first Hellblade and has no interest in Indiana Jones, this lineup is a joke.

Give me creativity like the genuises at Double Fine, a Rare game that actually looks interesting, another gem like Hi Fi Rush or a new Crackdown that isn't total dogpoop.

Re: Phil Spencer: Xbox's New Plan Is 'Not A Change To Our Fundamental Exclusive Strategy'

ShadowofTwilight

@Kaloudz

"No one knows what the landscape will be like in a decade or two."
"Will all Xbox exclusives become multiplat? Not in your wildest dreams. Not even close."

Pick one please and stop acting like you're some insider that knows all of Microsoft's business strategies when you really don't.

It's 4 games at the moment but if those games do very well then it's very likely that they will change course. Of course they will consider bigger games in the future, they could easily dispel the rumours and mudslinging but they won't because it's likely going to happen.

Sony and Nintendo don't need Xbox sales to be successful, same can not be said for Xbox.

Re: First Two Xbox Exclusives Coming To 'Rival Consoles' Reportedly Revealed

ShadowofTwilight

@Kaloudz

" Nope. But for the sake of your argument, let's remove Zenimax from the scenario and focus instead on ABK. Games from ABK, most notably Call of Duty, will be multiplat because they (MS) were practically forced into contractual obligations to please the regulators. Bringing Zenimax back to the spotlight, they did say on the world stage that they would be case by case, so they're obligated by their own words - especially if they want future acquisitions to go through. Does the why and how really matter though? Fact is, both sides have multiplat games... MS throwing out a very (very) small portion of their slate to other platforms is not the end of the world"

Nice try, Microsoft is only obligated to still release Call of Duty, all the regulators did was make it so they didn't have Cloud rights.

Just because Spencer and ZeniMax said that does not mean there's a contract in place to enforce it. They are only porting games because the employees are speaking out and Pine made it clear in court that he wasn't happy that they lost a massive consumer base over Microsoft.

Sony legally need to port MLB to retain the license and the buyout clause demands that Bungie operate on a multiplatform basis.

Sony will not port their IPs to Xbox like Microsoft looks to here. Also Sea of Thieves alone destroys your narrative that Microsoft are limiting this to just the publishers they took away.

Re: First Two Xbox Exclusives Coming To 'Rival Consoles' Reportedly Revealed

ShadowofTwilight

@Kaloudz

You absolutely can NOT say this is the same as Sony. MLB demanded the games go multiplatform and Sony had to do it to retain the license, they would still be exclusive otherwise.

Bungie demanded in the agreement of acquisition to still have full control and port where they see fit, this is not the same at all.

No one is forcing Microsoft here and the two publishers they took away didn't give a toss about their other consumer bases when they agreed to the buyouts.