Daric

@His_Dudeness do you have access to the Game Pass quests and whatnot?

FINALLY YES
i've been waiting for this for YEARS

The only thing that's really wrong imo is if people are able to get in more than one review (or if they are being hateful on the review text).
If most people think your game sucks, for whatever reason, why is it a "review bomb". People just don't like it, grow up

"don't like our game? you're a bigot"
nah fam, your game looks like garbage

Soul Hackers 2, F1 Manager and Two Point on my shortlist

saints row, cool

great. more junk on the game icons

@Benjamin not to go against your sentiment, but developers do sign NDA's. Usually it's also clearly stated on their contract they are not allowed to speak about ongoing developments without company permission.

@Liam_Doolan unrelated to the article, but why do i need to complete a captcha just to enter the website now? very annoying :/

@themightyant
"A few articles on niche website's like this isn't going to change it's sales outcome by much."

That's the bit isn't it. Because it probably won't change anything (even if the game is crap, which maybe even is idk) on the grand scheme, but it could mean Ubisoft refraining from working with this developer (company) in the future.

It's like getting my company hired to build a house. And as the outside paint is drying standing on the street going "looks a bit ***** don'it?" to people passing by.
(forgive the analogy, it probably sounded funnier in my mind!)

@Benjamin except this is isn’t whistleblowing, it’s plain old trash talk that puts your coworkers’ livelihoods in jeopardy. Even if you think it’s crap, it’s deserving of its marketing phase because there will surely be people who enjoy it. And this guy is trying to take a big ol dump on it for attention and internet epeen coupons

This trend of highlighting disgruntled developers crapping on games is terrible. It’s insulting to all other members of the team and very poor professionalism. Shouldn’t be rewarded with attention

@jarvismp i think it’s madness to spend 120+ quid every year on an MMO sub, but you don’t see nearly as much complaining. FIFA is 50/year and is consistently one of the best selling games so id say the price is right, madness or not.
Personally i like that there are deeper gameplay/content changes every year, rather than a game as a service model

@jarvismp So 50 quid is too much for a game people spend hundreds of hours on over the course of a year? Do you know any other yearly videogame that costs 15 quid at launch?
It’s the same conversation every year, gets tiresome. Most of all I always wonder why people who wouldn’t play it either way are the ones most bothered by it. Cheers mate

@IRRxJoker or you could, you know… unlock the upper classes? Do you hate progression that much?

@jarvismp i see this complaint every year (always coming from someone who doesn’t play the game of course) and my question has remained the same for years: what would you change on it? It’s a football simulation game, it’s already pretty good at simulating football. So what would you change, keeping in mind that suggesting a complete overhaul would alienate the millions of people who actually enjoy the game as it is?

@iplaygamesnstuff this didn't happen to me, but sucks to learn some people are having this issue

@Titntin this DLC is making me want to buy the Hot Wheels game next

Played it for an hour yesterday, it was really fun. But there's a whole lotta talking while racing, man stfu let me race lmao

Just gonna say it:
Game's not good enough for the amount of coverage it gets/has gotten along the years.

Not sure who this is for except for people that played it 25 years ago and forgot that it isn't that good.

@NEStalgia as you know, there was a time when Gold was just for online play. GwG was/is just a nice bonus since its inception.
It remains just like it always was. Difference being that now there are better value services for people who want games.
(plus, you don't even need Gold anymore to play free games online)

Halo 3 is just so good.
I enjoy Infinite, but you really can’t improve on perfect

return to monke

@Decoy_Snake damn son that’s a LOT can’t wait! I was playing it on the PS3 a while back lmao just played up until Madarame’s castle

@Decoy_Snake how does Royal make it better?

@Bartig it autosaves at every check point, the review is inaccurate

I don’t understand why you’d need “save/reload” when the game autosaves and has infinite respawning from the latest checkpoint tho. This isn’t an emulated version of the games, they save each play.

@xMightyMatt14x I’ve played through 1 2 and cd without any issues.. some bugs on the original mega drive versions are actually fixed

@JayJ they changed 3 tracks out of hundreds for licensing reasons. As for performance, i have no idea what you mean, I’ve been playing it for hours without issues.

But you seem to have made up your mind already. Hope you get to enjoy it eventually

@Fishticon that’s what going mainstream is. All other industries work like that, and exactly why some professional prefer to stay indie/freelance. But when your dream is to work on Sonic specifically, that’s not really an option.

@JayJ the sonic community is toxic cesspool. Ignore it. The game’s great, having lots of fun

Almost feels like a protest buy in Japan

@RadioHedgeFund THREE zone songs. That's what they "changed" by using the original prototype versions produced before MJ's involvement.

Three zones are affected. Out of 14 just in Sonic 3K.

You're the one missing out bruv

no thanks bro

Really miss those days, but if Xbox was to grow and prosper it had to grow beyond that. Really nice how MS managed to include more gamers without shutting out the hardcore ones that started it all.