Topic: General Xbox Series X|S Thread

Hi everyone, just signed up here. Got the Xbox series X yesterday and wanted to check some recommended games. Got gamepass and tried out Forza horizon 5 and Halo infinite. I’m impressed so far, great games! Looking for a solid plattformer and an rpg also. Other great games tips are welcome too of course. Thanks in advance!

@Goldbox I have yet to play it, but Psychonauts 2 is supposed to be very good and should cover your itch for a platformer. The original from back on the original Xbox is also on there of course if you haven't played that either. As for an RPG, there's a lot on there. For modern ones, The Outer Worlds is solid. Older classics such Fallout 3, Fallout New Vegas, Oblivion, and of course the Mass Effect trilogy via the recently added Mass Effect Legendary Edition are all highly recommended.

@KilloWertz
Thanks, will definitely check them out starting with psychonauts and oblivion!

So I went back to Shadow of the Tomb Raider and it's a massive upgrade on Series X compared to when I was playing on the original XB1 last year. A lot more stable and honestly is one of the best looking games I've played on my Series X. I know of course Series X games would look better on a better TV (my current one is like 7 years old) but I have no intention of upgrading my TV.

@Grumblevolcano The Tomb Raider games were some of the best looking games of the Generation and still impressive by the latest standards. The 'leap' for me wasn't as impressive as I came from the XB1X to Series X and have one of the best 4k HDR displays of 2016 (yes its coming up to 6yrs old now and therefore is lacking 'some' modern features like HDMI 2.1 so no 4k/120, no VRR etc, but still one of the 'best' HDR displays that 'cheaper' more modern TV's can't match). That being said, I think its still one of the best looking games of the generation and a great trilogy of games too...

@BAMozzy I forgot 4k HDR was a thing back then, I thought saying how old my TV was would be enough to get across the impression that a current 4K display would be gigantic upgrade. It's very basic 23 inch LED; 1080p; has HDMI, SCART, component and RCA ports.

The advantage of having such an old TV is that Switch games look good, I have heard that Switch games don't look particularly well on large and 4k displays.

@Grumblevolcano That was basically the first year of HDR10 specs when you had TV's that were 'HDR Premium' certified (min black levels, min brightness, min 'colour' range gamuts) but things like VRR, HLG, HDR10+ etc were not around. I bought my first 4k TV in 2014. Most 4k 'HDR' TV's for the first few years were nothing more than 'SDR' TV's with the brightness turned up to max and barely much brighter too but at least you 'could' watch HDR content without getting a 'black' screen or error message because the TV doesn't 'recognise' the HDR content.

When you have a '1080p' display with '4k' content, you have 4 'game' pixels to every 1 pixel the TV can display. Super Sampling would look at those 4 pixels, the 'colour' and decide what colour 'best' suits that '1' pixel. Two perfect Black and two perfect white game pixels may end up as a medium grey pixel because the average colour over the '4' pixels is grey. However, you are getting '4' pixels of information to try and make that '1' pixel the best colour it can be.

However,when you have 1080p game on a '4k' display, they don't use '4' display pixels as '1', they spread the 1080p image out across the whole displays pixel grid and interpolate. A single Black game pixel next to a single white pixel at 1080p gives a 'sharp' edge due to that contrast difference. But when 'spread' out to fill a 4k pixel grid, that leaves a 'small' pixel between the black and white game pixel that 'could' be any colour at 4k but without the 'information', the 'native' pixels around it are sampled (which are 'black and white' in this example) and a 'colour' is assigned (which would be medium grey) which is why things start to look much 'softer'. Those 'sharp' contrast edges now have reduced contrast edges so look much softer. This is more obvious on larger screens too as we tend to see with most 4k TV's in peoples homes. At 1080p, only 25% of the pixels are 'native' - the other 75% have been 'interpolated' from those.

Its the same as trying to compare '520p' content on your 1080p screen. Even 720p content, which is the equivalent of 1440p on a 4k Display, looks 'softer' on your HD TV. The XB1S and Switch in docked modes are often 'below' 1080p - 900p for example is like 450p on a 1080p in terms of upscaling and 720p, is like 360p on your HD TV. It doesn't look as bad, because 720p has 4x the information to begin with and 4k TV's at the 'same' size has smaller pixels so the difference isn't quite so bad, but, in terms of scaling, the image has to be scaled up the same percentage. The Switch on 4k TV's would be like having a 360-540p (sometimes dropping even lower) handheld 360p screen device running on your HD TV which is 'why' its often said that 'games' really don't look as 'good' as they do on HD TV's.

Great interview with Tim Schafer (Double Fine) which also talks about the MS acquisition, what its 'meant' to Double Fine and how they are 'operating' and allowing their studios creative freedom, supporting them to realise their ambition.

Microsoft’s video game subscription service Xbox Game Pass may be a fantastic value for money offer for Xbox gamers, but many have wondered where the profit is for Microsoft. Unsurprisingly, there isn’t much.

Speaking on an episode of the What’s Good Games podcast (July 20), Xbox marketing general manager Aaron Greenberg explained that, while the subscription service isn’t extremely profitable, Microsoft is in a very early privileged position where they don’t need to worry about short term profits.

“It’s a different mindset, because if you do optimise for profit… you can either say, “How do we get as much profit out of each customer?’ Or, do you pivot that [to its] opposite and say, ‘How do we add as much value to our fans, how can we actually over-deliver on value? And if you do that, you build fans for life.”

“Ultimately, we think long term that’s the right thing for the business, and will have long-term benefits for us. But, in the short term, yeah, it’s not a big profit play.”

By over-delivering on 'Value', MS have 'fans for life' who want to tell their friends, family and everyone who'll listen about Game Pass.

Even back in 2020, Game Pass was 'profitable' but not a 'big' profit service.

@BAMozzy I think you'd enjoy reading this article if you haven't already: https://www.axios.com/microsoft-activision-blizzard-phil-spen...

"Spencer maintains Microsoft's bid was greatly influenced by the completion of the company’s $7.5-billion-dollar ZeniMax/Bethesda gaming deal in early 2021. “The board of Microsoft, on the day that we got approval for ZeniMax, asked, 'What was next?'”

It genuinely sounds like the upper management at Microsoft isn't that bothered by profits for Xbox right now because they see huge opportunities with video games in general that they want to keep acquiring more companies. It's crazy to think that Phil has managed to convince Satya and all the other execs with his vision. I mean, just look at how much they spent on the Activision Blizzard deal. That to me is a strong indication that the higher-ups at Microsoft are completely on board with Phil's plans for Xbox.

@BAMozzy That's a very good point regarding accountability. I still find it bizarre how people these days actually use Rare as an argument when stating why Microsoft cannot manage their acquired studios. It happened 20 years ago under different leadership! If it had happened today with Phil Spencer, I'm sure it would've turned out much more differently. Even still, Rare is doing well for themselves in terms of Sea of Thieves.

But yeah, from what I've seen, Microsoft is managing their studios quite well generally speaking. We're obviously viewing them from an outside perspective, but logically speaking Microsoft wouldn't want to do anything that damages their ability to put out unique games on Game Pass. So it makes sense to leave them alone and give them the resources they need to produce great games.

@LtSarge It bugs me too. MS are not the same as they were 20yrs ago and even 8yrs ago were a different company with a different business model.

I doubt Lionhead would be closed and Fable Legends would of been released to Game Pass. Scalebound too would be Xbox Published and released to Game Pass. They were cancelled because of the 'sales' business model where 'low' console sales and increasing development costs make the project too expensive to finish. Why spend millions more on getting those games to release when hardware its releasing on is unlikely to sell enough copies to recuperate those costs.

The whole Game Pass model would have helped them, certainly helps Rare today although whether they can get back to their creative best now,who knows. I do think that Sea of Thieves would of been another 'flop', another thing that people will use to show how 'bad' MS are for devs if that game was not on Game Pass. I doubt it would of sold more than a few million at best, and died as that 'small' community couldn't help Rare support the game as well as they have. However, Game Pass gave people the chance to try free and its probably Rare's most 'successful' game of all time now with over 25m that have played it.

Its 'typical' Rare, which is what the Game Pass model is great for. All the studio's have their 'own' identity and style - whether its Rare, Bethesda, Arcane, 343, Ninja Theory or Double Fine for example. They are 'free' to create the games they want and feel passionate about, with the full support of MS. It was interesting to hear some ways they helped Double Fine on Psychonauts 2, particularly around Mental Health.

I have not been this optimistic about the future of gaming for a while - especially with so many companies recording bigger and bigger profits yet constantly complaining about rising costs and trying to find ways of extracting more and more money from consumers from fewer and fewer games, sticking only with the 'commercial' IP's, almost 'reskinning' them every 'year' to extract more money, reducing the overall quality and variety of gaming experiences. It was looking like that was the 'future' for AAA games with 'indies' offering the 'variety'.

Today seems like a good chance for the cancelled 360 Goldeneye remaster to be announced for Xbox given the N64 version could be announced for NSO Expansion Pack in the Direct.

Not that I want Rare to be stuck on Sea of Thieves indefinitely and I'd love them to make more games, more traditional games but the success of Sea of Thieves is astonishing. I wonder about the number of Minecraft players. Rare could do like Obsidian and support a few games simultaneously.

Total players:

• Sea of Thieves - 25+ Million
• Halo Infinite - 20+ Million
• Forza Horizon 5 - 18+ Million
• Minecraft Dungeons - 15+ Million
• Grounded - 10+ Million

What do people reckon about this?

I have got a modified IKEA Lappland TV Unit with a few of the glass shelf/door inserts. I have only three places within this unit that I could put the Series X, in an open cube (similar to a Kallax Cube), sideways or vertical on top, or what I've actually done which is inside a glass door insert with shelf removed and ventilation holes drilled in the back of it.

Do people think that's enough ventilation? I've got intake holes down the bottom and exhaust holes up the top. Before I drilled the holes I just used the Series X with the door open, reckon I could leave the door closed now and those holes will offer enough ventilation?

I've tried it with both streaming video and gaming. I think I could definitely have the door closed for watching Disney Plus etc. In terms of gaming, even with the door closed, it seems a lot cooler in there than it was with the door open before I drilled the holes.

The main reason I like the door closed is to prevent dust getting in. I know drilling massive holes into it is going to let some dust in but it will be a lot less than if the console was in a completely open area.

What do people think?

@ralphdibny I'm not an expert on this, but the way the Series X is placed reminds me a lot of how I placed my PS3 before it overheated, i.e. the fan was very close to a wall. I know you've made holes in there, but I think the issue is the proximity from the Series X fan to the wall above it. The heat gets reflected from the wall back to the console and that might lead to overheating, which is what happened to my PS3. Even if you were to place it horizontally in there, I think the issue would still persist. The Switch on the other hand seems better situated as the fan is so far away from the wall above it, not to mention that the system itself is so small that it doesn't emit that much heat.

Now I could be completely wrong but I just felt like giving my two cents on the subject.

@ralphdibny from my experience with the system it looks very close to the top shelf. I would say horizontally looks like the air will flow better

@LtSarge it does seem a little close to the shelf above to me as well. The shelf does get rather hot to the touch if I put my hand on it. I think I read somewhere that the top vent needs an inch and a half clearance from whatever is above it, which it does.

That cupboard did used to only contain the Switch but it seemed like the easiest place to put the Series X as well.

I think I'll have to see how it goes. It's fine with the door closed for streaming video but I played Yakuza 6 with the door closed for a few hours today and it did get a bit too hot in my opinion. I think I will leave it like that for now and just make sure I open the door when I'm playing games on it.

@Balta666 the alcove has the same dimensions horizontally as it does vertically. It's not a bad shout though. I think I'd have to drill vent holes in the panel to the right which has the TV on the other side. I'm not amazingly keen on the idea however because that's part of the TV unit itself rather than just a £15 insert.

I think if I went horizontal then I'd have to put the Series X up on top of the unit and just face the fact that I will have to dust it regularly. If I ever get a PS5 then it would end up horizontal on top of the unit for sure! It wouldn't fit anywhere else!