
During my time at Pure Xbox, I've been unapologetic in how much I like the Far Cry series - Far Cry 3 is one of my favourite games ever, and the few sequels that followed were very good fun too. Today though, new information coming out of Ubisoft suggests that the franchise will "push multiplayer" in future, and that approach has me quite worried about what's next for the IP.
Before I dive into why I'm worried, I should say that this news on a multiplayer focus for Far Cry is coming directly from Ubisoft's Yves Guillemot, as shared by Game File (paywall) and VGC. Basically, the Ubisoft boss has said that the next Far Cry will "bring the multiplayer aspects more predominantly [...] so that it can also be played for a long time". That's all well and good, but I just don't understand why multiplayer needs needs to be prominent to make that happen, personally.
Okay, sure, I might be a bit of an edge case - but I still regularly boot up the likes of Far Cry 3 and Far Cry 4 to this day. Their open worlds — single-player ones, might I add — are lively, dynamic playgrounds that almost feel like they continue to exist when I walk away from them. They don't of course, and I can go back and play them whenever I like at my own pace with the world unchanged, but Ubisoft nailed that feeling of an evolving world. All before the term 'live service' had been uttered.