Something else that Phil Spencer discussed during his lengthy (and fantastic) hour-long interview with IGN was the lack of an optical audio port on the Xbox Series X. We'd already heard it would be missing on the new system, but until now, we hadn't received a specific reason as to why:
“The marginal cost of everything is important. So if you look at a part on a console that’s maybe one, or two dollars and you say, ‘okay, how big of a deal is that inside of a console?’ That’s a few hundred dollars. But then you say, ‘okay, we’re going to plan to sell, you know, 100 million of these consoles.’ So you take two bucks over 100 million, now you’re $200 million over the life of the program.”
Spencer went on to reveal that Microsoft knows how many people are using the optical audio port on Xbox One, appearing to suggest it's a relatively small number. He also admitted he knew the decision might leave some people disappointed, but the company "has a plan for the future".
"We had a conversation with the headset manufacturers prior to all of this. So when we stood up and said your accessories are going to work, we weren’t kind of walking a tightrope there. We’d already had the conversations.”
Echoing this, manufacturer Astro Gaming recently announced that all of its current products (such as headsets) designed for Xbox One would work on Xbox Series X despite the lack of optical audio port, with a report suggesting Astro and Microsoft were "ironing out the details."
How do you feel about the lack of optical audio port on Xbox Series X? Let us know in the comments.
[source uk.ign.com]
Comments 5
Thats not good Mr. Spencer, I wonder how I will connect my 5.1 system then.
Optical Audio needs to die.
It was great during the Dolby Digital/DTS days, but it's time to kill it off with Dolby TrueHD, DTS-MA, Dolby Atmos and DTS:X available.
4K/HDR 5.1 Receivers with HDMI inputs are relatively cheap these days.
4K HDR HDMI 2.1 receiver are not cheap, it allways seemed strange to me to route video through a receiver when he only needed the audio. With all these changing HDMI standards it is even worse.
Best is still to have a video and a sound connector, when your sound is not played over your tv.
They made such an effort to reduce latency and now your video has to go trough another device, if you want 5.1 audio and adding latency, seems not smart
Optical has such a small bandwidth that it can't offer 5.1 audio without compression and with HDMI 2.1 and the specs of that, you can pass Dolby Atmos through a compatible TV to an Audio system.
In the past, to get uncompressed Dolby 5.1 (or better) you had to connect your device to an Audio System and pass the picture through to a TV but with 2.1, you can pass the audio through the TC and 2.1 also offers auto syncing too...
Optical is so outdated now and needs to go - like Scart and RCA cables have gone now too...
There is a reason TV's have a ARC HDMI input....
Ah I see, it seems that my sound system is eol =(
What do you think is the better option, with the lesser chance of compatibility problems.
ARC HDMI on TV or a Receiver with HDMI input?
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...